Identifying and understanding trade-offs between the desired economic, social and environmental objectives of NbS as well as between benefits for different stakeholder groups would enable a more strategic approach to NbS design and implementation and an improved understanding, management and evaluation of the multiple impacts of NbS.
Dumitru, A., Frantzeskaki, N. & Collier, M. Identifying principles for the design of robust impact evaluation frameworks for nature-based solutions in cities. Environ. Sci. Policy 112, 107–116 (2020).
Eggermont, H. et al. Strategic Research & Innnovation Agenda : Horizon Europe Partnership on Biodiversity. (2021).
European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation et al. Nature-based solutions: state of the art in EU funded projects. (Publications Office of the European Union, 2020).
European Environment Agency. Nature-based solutions in Europe policy, knowledge and practice for climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. (Publications Office of the European Union, 2021).
Kabisch, N. et al. Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecol. Soc. 21, art39 (2016).
Seddon, N. et al. Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 375, 20190120 (2020).
Somarakis, G., Stagakis, S. & Chrysoulakis, N. ThinkNature / Nature-Based Solutions Handbook. (2019) doi:10.26225/JERV-W202.