Mapping of EU R&I Implementation projects landscape

A MAPPING OF PROJECTS: WHAT FOR? Mapping the landscape of EU R&I and implementation projects on NbS is essential for building a robust evidence base, showcasing EU support, and guiding future efforts. The first version of the mapping covers major European R&I and implementation programmes, including BiodivERsA, Horizon 2020, Seventh Framework Programme (FP7), Interreg and LIFE (EU’s funding instrument for the environment and climate action) from 2011 to 2021. Updates will extend the initiatives included and the timeframe covered. For detailed methodology, please refer to the Annex 1 of the Roadmap, here.

KEY RESULTS: The funding from major EU programs for NbS showed a significant increase from 2011 to 2017, stabilising around 100 million euros annually thereafter. The number of funded projects also tripled during this period and has since remained steady.

Image
Figure 3: Funding in million euros of NbS Projects per Year, rolling 3-year average
Figure 3: Funding in million euros of NbS Projects per Year, rolling 3-year average

 

Key findings:

  • Prevalent Solutions’ Types: Solutions based on developing sustainable management protocols and procedures for managed or restored ecosystems (Type 2)*  were the most common (50%) – followed by solutions that involve creating new ecosystems (type 3) with 39% and by solutions that involve making better use of existing natural or protected ecosystems (type 1) with 10% of projects.

  • Top Societal Challenges: Climate Resilience (27%) and New Economic Opportunities and Green Jobs (16%) were the most studied societal challenges.

  • Popular Approaches: Issue-specific ecosystem-related approaches (i.e., ecosystem-based adaptation, mitigation, and disaster risk reduction) were prevalent (27%). Green Infrastructure and Ecological Restoration were the most studied specific approaches, representing 20.5% and 18% of all projects, respectively.

  • Common Ecosystem Types: Urban (23%) and agricultural land (20%) were the most studied ecosystems, followed by coastal (12,5%) and forest environments (11%).

*Following the typology developed by Eggermont, H. et al. Nature-based Solutions: New Influence for Environmental Management and Research in Europe. GAIA - Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 24, 243–248 (2015).